Grantland mentioned Survivors this week, and I was looking for a new set of stories to get into, so I started watching.
First thoughts after five episodes or so:
It’s a different animal than The Walking Dead. Yeah, they both center around some end-of-the-world shit, but Survivors turns the screw a little differently. Remove the imminent threat of danger from zombies, and what you’re left with might be even more dangerous: people.
This has a couple of effects. It slows the pace of the show down a bit: you’re not on the edge of your seat, waiting for something to pop out from behind a closed door (though honestly, you still sort of are). Rather, it’s a bit more about what binds people together, trust, and everyone’s motivations for living.
Plus, removing all the insane gore and rather severe violence makes physical aggression and violence that much more impactful. You’re not actively sitting around waiting for someone important to die, which makes it all the more meaningful when someone important comes close to dying. On the flipside, it does remove the “anything can happen” factor that The Walking Dead wears so proudly on its sleeve.
It’s ironic that a show about a world suffering from disease should suffer so fluently from first-season syndrome. As Peter David would say, we’re still at the part where everyone speaks fluent exposition; characters are drawn very broadly and predictably, and with a big ensemble cast, it’s hard to get to know what everyone’s really like in an organic and interesting way.
With as much shit as people give Rick from The Walking Dead for being naive or slightly clueless (or just bad at his job), I’m pretty sure American audiences would absolutely savage Abby, or Abby Gandhi, as I refer to her. Nice lady, good actress, and certainly the moral center (or centre—it is British, after all) of the show, but her sermonizing and always-rightness gets a bit annoying after awhile.
I appreciate that she’s morally and ethically correct, but occasionally, you’d think that being high-minded in the end times would get you severely dead. The English often tease Americans for their occasionally ridiculous optimism, but this show is a clear case of optimism when compared to more cynical American shows about similar subjects.
We all seem to think that the world will go to hell in a handbasket; they seem to think that tea-time will still be three o’clock sharp.
That said, Tom is the shit. Mark Millar wrote a great line in Ultimate X-Men about how Wolverine always looked at people like he was sizing them up for coffins, and that definitely describes Tom.
He’s capable of anything to keep his get-out-of-jail free card, and it’s always interesting to watch the others react when his ugly side comes out. He and Greg are the pragmatists, and Greg always gives him side-eye. I realize that he’s so magnetic because he’s the only three-dimensional character, but still.
Al’s completely earnest line castigating the religious nuts for just “following the first person that came along” is kind of awesome when you realize that he did the exact same thing.
It’s England. Why are so many people carrying baseball bats? I’ve lived there. It’s not that popular. It’s not even kind of popular.
The return of Bob. In a very fucked-up way, it’s nice to see Sarah have to answer for using and abandoning men. It’s interesting to see what happens when someone who hasn’t had to face the consequences of her actions has to deal with those consequences. Of course, Sarah promptly drops a dime on poor Anya, who gets dragged away.
It’s still early. Cars are still an option. Food supplies are still an option. Samantha has conveniently reconvened civilization in a eco-friendly complex. It’ll be interesting to see what happens when shit starts running out.
It’s time for another Republican goon-squad myth intervention.
It’s time for another Republican goon-squad myth intervention.
I spend a lot of time debunking various myths, slogans and lies, and the undisputed champion of easily debunkable myths continues to be the Republican Party. But, until now, I don’t think I’ve ever fully summarized the most glaring examples of GOP myths and lies. To be sure, this isn’t to suggest that all Republicans are easily-misled simpletons. They’re not. Yet their party consistently panders to its easily-misled simpleton base with the most egregiously dishonest ideas in American politics.
I hasten to note that this list obviously doesn’t cover everything and I’m sure you’ll have some additional examples for the comments below. But the following are definitely the 10 most mendacious things the GOP has attempted to foist upon the American public.
10) Obama Doubled the Deficit.
This was a favorite of the Mitt Romney campaign. Throughout 2012, Romney repeatedly said, “The president promised to cut the deficit in half. He’s doubled it!” No. No he hasn’t. First of all, this line depends entirely on voters not understanding the difference between the deficit and the debt. See previous “simpleton” remarks. Indeed, the president has absolutely cut the deficit by way more than half in his first five years. When he took office, the deficit for 2009 was projected to be $1.4 trillion. The deficit at the end of 2014 will be $514 billion, just three percent of GDP. That’s a nearly $1 trillion reduction in five years. Not only that, but the administration boasts the lowest year-over-year increase in government spending since Truman, and it’ll be one of just three administrations in the last 50 years that will have ended with a lower deficit than when it began. The last Republican do leave the White House with the same record was Eisenhower.
9) Man-Made Climate Change Is a Hoax.
According to a clearly liberal agency called “NASA,” a full 97 percent of scientists with specific expertise in climate science agree that climate change is real and humans are causing it. We shouldn’t really have to say anything else. Of course if you’re Lloyd Christmas from Dumb & Dumber, and “one-in-a-million” means “there’s a chance,” then the three percent of scientists who aren’t sure about climate change obviously indicates that it’s a hoax.
8) Cold Weather Disproves Climate Change
Second in our trifecta of climate change myths is an annual favorite. Every time it snows, you know the drill. Whenever there’s a snow storm everyone from Matt Drudge to Rush Limbaugh suddenly achieves nipple erections hard enough to cut glass. And out comes the myth that climate change can’t possibly be real because it’s snowing somewhere. What they fail to explain to their disciples is that New York City or Minnesota or Washington, D.C., isn’t, you know, the globe. Climate scientists base their global warming observations on global temperature averages. So while it might be snowing outside Sean Hannity’s house, average temperatures year-over-year are growing progressively higher.
7) Tax Cuts Do More to Stimulate The Economy Than Food Stamps and Unemployment Benefits.
Every dollar spent on unemployment benefits generates 1.61 in economic growth.
Every dollar spent on food stamps generates 1.74 in economic growth.
But every dollar spent on rolling tax rates back to Bush-era levels only creates .32 in economic growth — that’s a 68-cent loss on investment.
6) Cars Kill a Lot of People and No One Wants to Ban Them Like Guns!
Unlike firearms, cars aren’t explicitly designed to kill or wound living beings (humans, animals, etc). They’re designed to move you from one place to another. Yet unlike firearms, cars and drivers are heavily regulated by the government, from emissions standards to annual inspections to safety features, and so forth. You can’t legally drive a car that doesn’t feature seatbelts, or a car that spews too much exhaust into the air. You have to take both a written and a behind-the-wheel test to get a license to operate a car. You often have to renew that license at regular intervals and, if you’re older, you have to prove that you’re physically capable of driving a car. You can’t drive a car while drinking alcohol or impaired by other chemicals. There are thousands of police officers patrolling our roads and, as most of us have experienced at one time or another, they will penalize or arrest you for improper handling of a car — with literally hundreds of laws to abide, and considerable penalties, ranging from fines to imprisonment to the government stripping you of your right to drive a car at all. So if the NRA and its supporters are going to keep using this car analogy, then let’s talk about regulating guns and gun owners the same way we regulate cars and drivers.
5) The Affordable Care Act Covers Abortion-Inducing Emergency Contraception.
Admittedly, there are so many Obamacare myths to choose from: death panels, IRS goon squads raiding homes, it’s a “job killing” law, it’s a “government takeover,” etc. It’s all a pile of hooey and definitely worth mentioning here. But this lie about emergency contraception coverage is so insidious that it even managed fool some liberals. Contrary to lawsuits by various religious businesses and organizations, the various forms of emergency contraception covered by the law do not, in fact, block implantation of a fertilized egg. If these medications were indeed abortifacients, they wouldn’t be covered because it’s illegal for the government to do so. But they’re not abortifacients, so they’re covered. Simply put: while some emergency contraception blocks implantation, the emergency contraception that’s covered in the law blocksovulation — not implantation. Of course that won’t stop the lawsuits or likely factor into the opinions of perhaps five Supreme Court justices when the first major Obamacare contraception decision drops this Summer.
Okay, just stop it with this. No, the Obama campaign wasn’t handing out free phones in exchange for votes. However, there’s definitely a program that offers low-cost telephones to citizens who can’t afford one. The truth is the Lifeline program has been around since 1984 when, that’s right, Ronald Reagan helped to create it. In 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) set up a non-profit outfit called the Universal Service Administrative Company, which receives financial backing via the Universal Service Fund. According to its website, money for the program is contributed entirely by “long distance companies, local telephone companies, wireless telephone companies, paging companies, and payphone providers,” and none of the funding comes from taxpayers via the federal government. It’s all privately donated money.
3) It’s Safer to Have a Gun in the House, or a Concealed Weapon on Your Person.
I’m going to step aside and let an actual Republican debunk this one. Here’s David Frum:
This is so dumb, it easily ranks as the most ridiculous climate change lie. Yes, more ridiculous than the blizzard thing. It’s truly astonishing that anyone with half-a-brain actually believes it. Speaking of half-a-brain, here are some prime offenders:
"Now I know there is also a movement to say that carbon dioxide should be guided or should be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency. I disagree with that. I exhale carbon dioxide. I don’t want those guys following me around with a meter to see if I’m breathing too hard."
The stupidity is, pardon the pun, breathtaking. On the surface, this “exhaling” silliness sounds like it might be true — if you’re really into uneducated, simplistic explanations for very complex topics. Not only does human breathing not even makethe list of greenhouse gases but, chiefly, the ecosystem wasn’t designed to scrub out unprecedented levels of CO2 released by the burning of fossil fuels. Therefore all of that excessive CO2 is just lingering in the atmosphere, trapping heat and scrambling our weather patterns.
1) Voter Fraud Is a Serious Issue That Requires Strict New Voter ID Laws.
Nope. Not even close. Once again, this falls into the Lloyd Christmas category. Successful prosecutions of voter fraud cases barely amount to one one-hundredth of one percent of total votes cast in a single general election. In Ohio, for example, Secretary of State Jon Husted ballyhooed his war against fraud by nabbing a whopping 20 potential cases. 20 out of nearly six million votes cast in that state in 2012. The Bush Justice Department found that there were as few as 80 successful prosecutions of voter fraud cases out of hundreds of millions of votes cast since 2000. For this ratio of possible-fraud-to-votes-cast we’re told we need laws that make it more difficult to vote. By the way, some Republicans came right out and said it: this isall aboutelectingRepublicans.
That’s it. It’s of course foolish to think the Republicans will drop these lies and myths any time soon. But as long as various Republicans continue to repeat these transparently obvious falsehoods, they should expect that the rest of us will continue to think they’re either idiots or that they’re deliberately trying to deceive their own people — or maybe a little of both.